How is Vantage different from ChatGPT or Claude?

ChatGPT and Claude write you a document. Vantage keeps the document, prototype, tickets and roadmap connected to the feedback and decisions behind them, and tells you when one of them changes. You can also bring your Vantage context into Claude or ChatGPT, so you don’t have to choose.

Do I have to move off Notion or Linear?

No. Keep the tools you use and connect them to Vantage. Tickets push to Linear with two-way sync, and you approve every change that comes back.

What can I do in the first ten minutes?

Paste customer feedback or describe a problem, and get a PRD with every requirement linked to its source. You can try the demo on this page without signing up. Connect your tools whenever you’re ready.

I own several projects. What does Vantage do across them?

It briefs you every morning on what needs your call, catches specs that contradict each other, and flags anything that went stale after a decision changed. It works for a single project and earns its keep at two or more.

What if the AI gets something wrong?

Nothing updates silently. Every requirement cites the quote, call or metric behind it, and every change arrives as a diff you accept or reject before it touches your docs, tickets or Linear.

Can I use Vantage from Claude or ChatGPT?

Yes. Connect Vantage’s MCP server to Claude, add the GPT Action in ChatGPT, or use an API key. Then ask about your projects, search your specs, or create tickets from wherever you work.

Start on your own for free. When teammates join, they work from the same context, with admin, editor and viewer roles and private drafts that stay invite-only until you publish.

What does fair use mean on the unlimited features?

Unlimited features are meant for real day-to-day work by one person: up to 50 questions a day on Pro and Business, and on Business up to 10 PRDs, journeys or ticket batches a day. Very few people get close. If your team regularly needs more, talk to us.

Your data is encrypted in transit, and we never train on it. The AI providers we use are contractually barred from training on it too. You can disconnect any integration or delete your account at any time. We’re pursuing SOC 2 Type II.

How much does it cost?

Vantage is free to start with 300 credits and no credit card. Projects are unlimited on every plan, and AI work like generating a PRD or a ticket batch uses credits. Pro is $19 per seat a month billed annually ($25 monthly) with 1,500 credits a month, unlimited questions and prototypes. Business adds a shared team workspace and 4,000 credits per seat a month.

Should similar issue titles always be merged?

No. Compare the actual problem and expected outcome. Similar wording can describe separate failures that need independent ownership.

Which issue should become the canonical record?

Choose the issue with clear ownership and useful investigation history, then preserve unique evidence from the duplicate before marking it.

What if a duplicate contains additional reproduction details?

Compare its evidence with the canonical issue and carry over the distinct conditions or logs. Keep the duplicate link so reporters can trace how their report contributes to the investigation.

How-To2026-10-292 min read

Merge Duplicate Issues in Linear

Mark the redundant issue as a duplicate of one canonical issue. Linear transfers linked attachments and customer requests through the duplicate workflow, but you should reconcile conflicting descriptions yourself.

Step-by-step guide

Check access and scope

You need access to both issues and agreement about which one should carry the work forward.

Compare the reports

Compare reproduction steps and expected outcomes to confirm one underlying problem.

Choose the canonical issue

Choose the canonical issue with the clearest ownership and useful history.

Worked example: Two reports describe expired invite links. Keep the engineering investigation as the canonical issue, preserve the second report device details, and distinguish a separate email-delivery failure rather than merging it.

Preserve unique evidence

Copy any unique acceptance criteria or investigation notes into the canonical issue.

Mark the duplicate

Use Mark as duplicate and select the canonical issue. Start from the redundant issue, not the canonical record; the action marks the selected issue as the duplicate.

Inspect the surviving record

Inspect the canonical record and explain the decision to affected subscribers.

Verify the result

The redundant issue points to the canonical record and unique evidence is still accessible.

Common mistakes

Avoid the main failure mode

Similar titles do not prove duplication. Merging distinct user failures can hide scope and distort customer-request counts.

Check the handoff edge case

Choosing the oldest issue automatically can leave the least useful description as the canonical record. Compare evidence and ownership first.

Sources and verification

Based on product documentation checked on 2026-10-24. This is a documentation-based guide, not a hands-on benchmark. Features and availability can change.