How is Vantage different from ChatGPT or Claude?

ChatGPT and Claude write you a document. Vantage keeps the document, prototype, tickets and roadmap connected to the feedback and decisions behind them, and tells you when one of them changes. You can also bring your Vantage context into Claude or ChatGPT, so you don’t have to choose.

Do I have to move off Notion or Linear?

No. Keep the tools you use and connect them to Vantage. Tickets push to Linear with two-way sync, and you approve every change that comes back.

What can I do in the first ten minutes?

Paste customer feedback or describe a problem, and get a PRD with every requirement linked to its source. You can try the demo on this page without signing up. Connect your tools whenever you’re ready.

I own several projects. What does Vantage do across them?

It briefs you every morning on what needs your call, catches specs that contradict each other, and flags anything that went stale after a decision changed. It works for a single project and earns its keep at two or more.

What if the AI gets something wrong?

Nothing updates silently. Every requirement cites the quote, call or metric behind it, and every change arrives as a diff you accept or reject before it touches your docs, tickets or Linear.

Can I use Vantage from Claude or ChatGPT?

Yes. Connect Vantage’s MCP server to Claude, add the GPT Action in ChatGPT, or use an API key. Then ask about your projects, search your specs, or create tickets from wherever you work.

Start on your own for free. When teammates join, they work from the same context, with admin, editor and viewer roles and private drafts that stay invite-only until you publish.

What does fair use mean on the unlimited features?

Unlimited features are meant for real day-to-day work by one person: up to 50 questions a day on Pro and Business, and on Business up to 10 PRDs, journeys or ticket batches a day. Very few people get close. If your team regularly needs more, talk to us.

Your data is encrypted in transit, and we never train on it. The AI providers we use are contractually barred from training on it too. You can disconnect any integration or delete your account at any time. We’re pursuing SOC 2 Type II.

How much does it cost?

Vantage is free to start with 300 credits and no credit card. Projects are unlimited on every plan, and AI work like generating a PRD or a ticket batch uses credits. Pro is $19 per seat a month billed annually ($25 monthly) with 1,500 credits a month, unlimited questions and prototypes. Business adds a shared team workspace and 4,000 credits per seat a month.

Must we use native voting?

No. A manual exercise can work, but its visibility and process limitations must be explicit.

Should the most votes always win?

No. The decision owner must consider evidence and constraints.

What if participants disagree on criteria?

Resolve or separate the questions before voting; combining incompatible judgments creates a misleading tally.

Product workflows2026-10-292 min read

Run Criteria-Based Dot Voting in Miro

Ask participants to evaluate prepared options against one explicit criterion, then discuss the result. Use native voting if available for your workspace, or clearly label a manual dot exercise; neither substitutes for evidence.

Before you start: Have board access, an accountable decision owner and comparable option summaries. Verify native voting availability rather than promising the same controls on every plan.

Worked example: Choose which onboarding problem most blocks first value, not which proposed screen looks nicest. Keep feasibility constraints visible before allocating dots.

Step-by-step guide

Normalize the options

Give each option the same amount of evidence and explanation. Keep polished mockups from dominating a comparison of unequal detail.

State the criterion

Write the exact question participants should answer. Separate customer impact from implementation effort when they are different judgments.

Define allocation

Agree the number of votes and whether stacking is allowed. Explain the process before starting either native voting or manual dots.

Collect independent views

Allow silent assessment before discussion. If using visible manual dots, acknowledge the influence that earlier votes can have.

Review the tally

Discuss the evidence behind leading and dissenting choices. Check mandatory constraints rather than treating preference as a final score.

Record the owner’s decision

Save the chosen action, rationale and unresolved risk. Keep the vote as input alongside the actual decision.

Common mistakes

Votes prove customer value

They show participant preference, not market evidence.

Different criteria mixed

The tally becomes hard to interpret.

Manual dots called anonymous

Visible marks can influence others. State the limitation.

Tips

Keep option summaries equally detailed.

Ask dissenters for their strongest concern.

Separate constraints from preferences.

Sources and verification

Based on product documentation checked on 2026-10-24. This is a documentation-based guide, not a hands-on benchmark. Features and availability can change.