Template for Linear

Feature Prioritization Template for Linear (Free)

Linear's opinionated design means prioritization works differently than in Jira. Instead of custom fields and calculated scores, Linear uses labels, priorities, and filtered views to organize prioritization decisions. This template leverages Linear's strengths for fast, clean prioritization.

The approach uses Linear projects for prioritization cycles and labels for categorization, with custom views that surface the right information.

Template sections

4 sections covering the complete feature prioritization workflow.

01

Label System for Prioritization

Create label groups for prioritization dimensions: Impact (High Impact, Medium Impact, Low Impact), Confidence (High Confidence, Medium Confidence, Low Confidence), and Theme (Growth, Retention, Platform, Tech Debt). These labels replace custom fields and enable filtered views.

02

Prioritization Project

Create a "Prioritization: [Quarter]" project. Add all candidate features as issues in this project. Use Linear's built-in priority field (Urgent, High, Medium, Low, No Priority) for initial triage. Add Impact and Confidence labels for RICE-like scoring.

03

Custom Views

Create filtered views: "High Impact + High Confidence" (quick wins to approve), "High Impact + Low Confidence" (needs validation), "Low Impact" (candidates for decline), and "By Theme" (grouped for strategic balance). Share these views with stakeholders for async input.

04

Triage Workflow

Use Linear's triage inbox for new feature requests. The PM reviews triage weekly, assigns Impact and Confidence labels, and either moves items to the prioritization project or declines them with a reason. This prevents feature requests from accumulating without review.

Copy-paste template

# Feature Prioritization — Linear Setup

## Label Groups
### Impact
- High Impact (red)
- Medium Impact (yellow)
- Low Impact (gray)

### Confidence
- High Confidence (green)
- Medium Confidence (yellow)
- Low Confidence (red)

### Theme
- Growth
- Retention
- Platform
- Tech Debt

## Views
1. **Quick Wins:** Impact=High AND Confidence=High
2. **Needs Validation:** Impact=High AND Confidence=Low
3. **Decline Candidates:** Impact=Low
4. **By Theme:** Grouped by theme label

## Workflow
1. New requests land in Triage
2. PM reviews weekly, adds labels
3. Moves to Prioritization project
4. Quarterly review: approve, defer, or decline

Frequently asked questions

Generate instead of filling in templates

Connect your tools, and Vantage generates the content using real product data. Free to start.

Free to start. No credit card required.

Related reading